Seth Turin

beatgnu, I get where you're coming from. I think that we can all relate to an experience that we had with a company where it seemed like they didn't have our best interest in mind. Back before the days of UBot, when my credit wasn't as good, I remember some phone calls with a company that said they could fix it. I didn't have to talk to them for very long before it became clear that they were really just after my money, and had no interest in doing anything for me at all. An experience like that can leave you with a sense of indignation and that there needs to be justice for people who have be

You get 3 months of free updates, and after that you can subscribe to further updates. If you're confused about where you stand with it, please open a ticket at support.ubotstudio.com and they can look at your account.

I don't actually have the ability to ban anyone from the skype group. You were banned by the owner for being disruptive and not adding anything to it. As for the forum, criticism is always allowed, but being disrespectful to my staff or other members is not something we tolerate.

Lol, well I guess you can't please everyone. I assure you all that I stand behind UBot's business practices 100% and we have nothing to hide or to be ashamed about. To the OP - if you want to sue us, I wholeheartedly endorse your right to do so. To all those who made reasonable complaints, there's some real food for thought there. Our business model isn't set in stone for all eternity, and we're always looking for better ways to cover our high monthly development and upkeep costs, while providing our customers with the sort of options that will keep them (well, most of them) happy and feelin

@buddy how do you get them to like it without logging into their account? @george I think the best way to monetize a free bot is to require an email opt in to get it. Email marketing is still probably one of the most profitable ways to make money online if you know how to do it right.

Our marketing team thinks it has more market appeal. Does anyone else want to chime in on this? Is bot bank good/bad? Why/why not?

Hey guys Just wanted to let you know that we're looking at the issue. I'm talking to Ed about it now to probe deeper into what's going on. He will be posting soon with more information.

Nothing makes me happier than UBot customers (and there are many) who've made back the cost of their purchase of UBot - and then some. And I sincerely appreciate all the effort everyone in the forum goes through, and am always glad to see such kind words. Thanks TJ and everyone for your continued support of the software. We will continue to improve it!

We're working on a system that will allow UBotters to retrieve previously compiled bots. I expect for it to be made available in the later part of this year. If you're concerned about privacy, I assure you that all data is encrypted and your privacy is fully protected.

Yeah I mean we're doing what we can. It's a priority to us because it hurts our credibility. The thing is, the AV companies don't publish which activities will get your software flagged. If it were simple as just making a list of what not to do and then not doing those things, then this wouldn't be an issue in the first place. As it is, all we can do right now is go back and forth with the individual companies trying to fix it the best we can, and believe me, we are doing that.

http://www.noblesamurai.com/dojo/marketsamurai/ These videos actually go along with the Market Samurai software, but even if you don't own the software, they do a really good job and explaining the basics of keyword research.

Hmm for the word count thing, you could do something like $list total( $list from text( #my text, " ")) to give you the word count. The pro version has a $text length constant that gives you the letter count of each word. It can be a little tricky in standard.

If I may speak candidly for a moment, I just want to say that private proxies have been the bane of UBot's existence. It's a consequence of using Internet Explorer as our browser interface. The good news is that this will be a total non-issue in UBot Studio 4. As of right now, private proxies work 100% in UBot Studio 4 Alpha.

If I understand your request, I think John is correct, that the command you need is wait finish.

There are so many great things we can add to UBot someday. Ed's working full time working in amazing ideas. Having something like this in UBot might be pretty useful, but it may take some time before we have the man hours to devote to it. In the mean time, some good ideas have been shared here.

yeah it's just an unfortunate consequence of the security software we're using. ubot 4 will no longer use the software and I suspect the AV issues will go away.

UBot Studio 3 has multithreading now, but UBot Studio 4 will push it to new heights. You'll be able to do more with multithreading than is currently possible with anything on the market and it will be easier to use than UBot Studio is even now.

$eval will be more specifically for javascript. math stuff is going to be done in a more intuitive way. but yeah, it should be universal.

yes yes and yes. now shhh

it's a pretty big project. I'd like to get it done by june, but it's still too early to say for sure. I can't give away too much, but I can say that all the little idiosyncacies in ubot 3 are going to be fixed. I'm talking about things like the trouble with private proxies, user agent, the quirkiness of captchas, the shell command, clearing cookies, language barriers... am I forgetting any? Of course, ubot 4 will be more than a collection of bug fixes. the technology in it will make botmaking easier than is even currently imaginable. you'll be able to make even complex bots in a fraction of

nice work btw darryl

We certainly do care about these issues! The problem is that the customization you suggested would take a lot of time and resources to implement into this version. Expect that it will be taken care of in UBot Studio 4 however!

new proposal for this here: http://ubotstudio.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6630-proposal-for-bringing-back-the-dev-license/