clkmnky

Hi Nick, Thank you so much for taking the time to reply. Sometimes it's useful to get someone else's perspective on how to potentially obtain a solution. Oddly enough, neither Aymen's File Management plugin nor the Heopas plugin contain Functions or Parameters that would appear to produce a file size. For example, the "$file info" parameter within Aymen's File Functions plugin provides these options: -Get Creation Time -Get Last Write Time -Get Last Access Time (They're phenomenal plugins, I should add, and appreciate you bringing them to my attention!) It occurred to me there might be

Hi! Question: 1) You navigate to a webpage using the UScript "navigate" command. 2) Now you want to determine the kilobyte/megabyte size of the data contained on the webpage. Any thoughts or perspectives on whether or not this can be accomplished with either native UScript code or alternatively via a plugin? Thanks in advance for any insights.

Hello! What's the name of the specific font whose bold version you'd like to use? I might be able to provide you with a specific code example. I genuinely couldn't figure out how to specifically use the built-in image functions, so I waded into ImageMagick command line instructions that oddly made more sense to me. I'm able to trigger bold face versions of fonts (even custom created fonts) directly via ImageMagick.

UPDATE: I re-discovered a circa 2010 "EeePC" that I had stashed away which happens to be loaded with the Windows 7 Starter edition operating system, an Intel Atom N450 processor, and 2 gigabytes of RAM. I was successfully able to load UBot Studio v5.9.55 and once again have access to the native FTP functionality that no longer exists when using UBot Studio in Windows 10. I'm familiar with the shell/batch file workaround that others have pointed out that can be used to perform FTP commands from UBot Studio within a Windows 10 working environment. I can confirm the workaround works. However, for

I'm not experiencing this issue, but I read the information contained in the link that Pash shared, and the only potential thing that jumped out was this line: Based on the fact db00 mentions having 70 gigs of RAM, 30 of which are usually always available, that strongly suggests that a 64bit version of Windows 7 is being used (assuming the information in db00's profile is accurate, wherein it mentions the OS being used as Windows 7). To the best of my knowledge, UBot Studio is a 32 bit program/process. That means, based on what Microsoft published, that an OOM (out of memory error) ca

Hi! If you happen to be running the Windows 7 operating system (regardless of edition), and are also running UBot Studio, could you please take a moment to kindly comment on whether or not the FTP functionality that's built into UBot Studio works for you? This is primarily in reference to Bug # 1217 wherein FTP stopped working. I think I recall some individuals mentioning that they weren't experiencing this bug, and the primary variable seemed to be the operating system being used. Thanks in advance for any thoughts or comments.

**STANDING OVATION!** That. Is. AMAZING! I'm extremely impressed with your dedication and determination to achieve a practically clean VT result on the UBot Studio compiled executable itself. Like, really... WOW! The biggest variable that jumps out at me is what VT reports as the file sizes. The first iteration of AIAS is reported by VT to be 19.48 MB. The second iteration of AIAS (the one that is practically 100% clean) is reported by VT to be 21.07 MB in size. There seems to be widespread consensus that the #1 reason all these false positives occur is because there's a mechanism

I agree 100% with this. Once the installer unpacks/installs the UBot Studio compiled executable for AI Article Spinner, it resides here (at least on my machine): C:\Program Files (x86)\AI Article Spinner\AI Article Spinner\AIArticleSpinner.exe To the extent a particular AV that's installed on an end-users machine is flagging a UBot Studio compiled executable as a virus, and then deleting it or making it unavailable to the user, then the method Romeo has suggested will not ultimately solve the problem. The reason why is because the AV system installed on the end-users machine will invaria

It appears to be a situation in which the installer/wrapper turns up a clean VT test result, but the enclosed UBot Studio compiled executable (which shares the same name as the installer/wrapper) turns up as virus infected malware: https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/adb82e49091fd8d4efb68f08cd017cec38133b0f716693f65cc3a68f44a92e6f/detection It's definitely a clever work-around that relies on the idea that someone might scan/check the installation executable file with something like VT, but not necessarily check the enclosed files. My preference is to still be upfront about it, as described

All -- Nobody wants to download and use software that appears to be virus infected malware. So when I share a link to this VirusTotal detection report... https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/41fdbe471f168cb82a2931dcb009ca236dc8280c808f29f415dde3a86939d4b4/detection ...and you see that 30 out of 68 anti-virus/malware programs classify it as dangerous (at least as of the time I'm sharing the report link)... You're likely to conclude there's no way anyone would ever download and use the software. And that's what I'd initially assume, too. But thousands, if not tens-of-thousands of peop

I'm not using 6.01 or 6.02 at the moment, but during my failed attempt to get 6.01 to work in a manner that reasonably resembled the functionality of 5.9.55, I noticed the following bullet point in the release notes for 6.01: *** Note: The new internal browser requires the .net framework version 4.5.2. Please make sure this is installed on your system *** The only reason I bring this to your attention is that there's a slight chance that having -any- version of the .NET framework that's inconsistent with what's emphatically listed in the release notes (including versions below or above 4.5

I'm genuinely grateful for HelloInsomnia's step-by-step suggestions regarding creating a backup directory prior to upgrading. (link: http://network.ubotstudio.com/forum/index.php/topic/22154-read-this-before-you-update/) This made it dramatically less challenging to completely remove 6.01 from my machine after experiencing Bug 1276, Bug 1272, and several others, and to remain with 5.9.55 for the time being. I'm convinced that the machines being used to develop and test 6.01 are different than my machine, and the machines of others. My rationale for saying this is that it's hard to imagin

I'm not sure that there necessarily has to be a feature-for-feature "match" with ExBrowser for the multi-browser functionality being announced to be useful. But as I alluded to previously, I'm cautiously optimistic that the multi-browser functionality described in the announcement will extend to apps/bots that are compiled with UBot Studio. To the extent this newly announced functionality is relegated to only being operational from within UBot Studio itself, and cannot be extended to compiled apps/bots, it leaves ExBrowser with a competitive advantage. I guess we'll find out soon enough,

+1 I'm cautiously optimistic that the functionality described in the announcement will extend to apps/bots that are compiled with UBot Studio. To the extent this newly announced functionality is relegated to only being operational from within UBot Studio itself, and cannot be extended to compiled apps/bots, it leaves ExBrowser with a competitive advantage as it relates to compiled apps/bots (reference link).

bestmacros: Thanks for clarifying. In the ideal scenario, it sounds like the optimal outcome would be a UBot Studio that can automate all major popular websites (defined as perhaps the top 50 traffic-getting websites in the world), right out-of-the-box. No need for special plugins or third-party accessories. You had previously mentioned ..."naked out-of-the box ubot is not usable on most popular websites because of internal browser"... which got me thinking. I'm very much still a UBot "newbie" in the sense that I don't know everything about the tool. If, for example, the UBot internal b