Jump to content
UBot Underground

PRO

ADMIN
  • Content Count

    464
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by PRO

  1. @Urgent Enquirer, Yes, I know they make it not exactly easy to figure out. On the SERPs especially, they use the same classes a lot for the DOM elements and other things that make it hard selecting and interacting with desired elements. I did this for a rather educational purpose a few months back. Needs me more time to read through my previous code (have a lot in hundreds of files). Another user also asked this. As soon I have time to investigate my old code or do a new one, I let you know. Till then I can only say, it should be possible with some advanced XPath (combination of sel
  2. @Urgent Enquirer, welcome. I would say always write the simplest and shortest code that works for you. I did no check to keep things as simple as possible. If no check needed, don't check. This is how a Google Privacy Consent Page looks like:
  3. I know it's not 80s, just found the performance worth sharing here, special thing... Have a nice day. Giorgia Angiuli - Live Set for Awesome Soundwave & Beatport.
  4. Hello @Urgent Enquirer, this is how you can handle G Search with UBot natively (without plugins): navigate("https://www.google.com","Wait") wait(3) comment("Click Google Consent Button if present") click(<class="tHlp8d">,"Left Click","No") wait(1) navigate("https://www.google.com","Wait") change attribute(<name="q">,"value","weather") type text(<name="q">,"\{ENTER\}","Standard") Feel free to leave a like if this helped you further.
  5. @Bliss, seems like "you have been one with the bliss" 😁 Really amazing story and thanks for your best wishes. Have sent you a PM.
  6. Haha. Regarding 3.) I once had a python developer begging me to code it in UBot instead (really) 😂 He was like "please you develop this instead of me, using your UBot Studio thing. Otherwise I would need to spend countless sleepless nights, weekends etc. in order to achieve the results. And I know that for you, using UBot, you can code it all up in one afternoon session" 🤠 (he was noticably slow in progressing with his approach and he experienced bugs and challenges already without being near to finish important modules of a first prototype. He was already sitting with it for ages,
  7. Thank you, @Bliss. Totally agree on point 1 and 2. 1. yes 2. yes (up to 10 in a bundle, this is a restriction from our licensing system. There will be an option to get all, even if it will consist of 2 or 3 bundles.) 3. UBot still holds on to me. Love it so much and appreciate the usefulness of it, so that I even took on the extra effort securing and prolonging Pash's legacy plugins, putting small team of Automaxed in place, already working on improving on things, making things ready for the future. I never saw another convincing alternative to UBot Studio (plus plugins). I
  8. Hello @cob007, thanks for your suggestion. Following your advice we would rather have no apple devices at all anymore (because without Steve Jobs?)? 🙃 This approach will not work for us, I am sorry. It would not benefit the community. I understand your point and take your feeback in consideration (valuing legacy customers). Thanks for expressing your gratitude towards Pash, he has done an incredible work indeed.
  9. Can recommend the 5.9.55 version. You can download here https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ubotsupportfiles/5.9.55+Setup.msi Tested on Windows 7 SP1, .NET 4.8 - all works great. (image attached) I also ran the latest version of UBot on that same windows 7 machine recently. Did you try this already? It should work. Good luck.
  10. Hello @Bliss, thanks for asking. We want to preserve and maintain the plugins for the long run. It involves things from improving the documentation, ongoing testing, as well as the maintanence of the plugins. There may be no regular updates for the old customers from ubotplugin.com. However, we do our best to honour all the legacy customers from Pash. So we definetly try to take your needs and expectations into account. In the meantime we will soon start to make plugins available again for all you guys, so you can continue your work without further delays. Starting from end of 2
  11. PRO

    For everyone who has problems with the license server. Help is coming soon.

    The launch program of Automaxed will give early access to beta testers in the coming days.

    Do my best to speed things up. Stay tuned.

    Preview:

     

    automaxed-launch-program.jpg

    1. daverawcus

      daverawcus

      do we have to buy all the plugins we previously purchased again???

  12. Hello @MMD, really sorry for the inconvenience. The Automaxed launch program will be starting soon. With this we want to help you guys out (maybe you will help us back in return). Expect it to be ready to start within the next week. Will get announced in the forum. Here is a preview screenshot. Have sent you a PM.
  13. Hello @sunny9495, I currently work towards convincing you otherwise. I have the honour to maintain Pash's legacy plugins. We will get them up and running again soon. And I work with the team of Ubot to care about Ubot Studio also. Doing our best to show some appreciation to all the loyal long term Ubot users and developers out there. And also keeping the useful software up and running for our own sake as well.
  14. You're welcome. Regarding stability, for me (and I use Ubot a lot) the 5.9.55 is working like a gem, getting things automated. I tend to use it together with multiple helpful plugins that enhance the capabilities of Ubot further in a lot of ways also. I was able to build a crypto trading bot and a bot that notifies us when certain things happen via messenger app and more. So for me Ubot is like a hidden gem. Not many know it's power. I can code much faster with it than with everything else I saw But I know the product is not 100% easy to get to know around, understanding w
  15. Hello @stever, personally I rely on the 5.9.55 version a lot. Here is the download link: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ubotsupportfiles/5.9.55+Setup.msi Also we do our best to improve the 6.x versions further. In the meantime, the 5.9.55 should just work fine.
  16. I did it once for a rather educational purpose. It worked. But I need to search for it. When I find it again I let you know.
  17. I am working on it atm. Will notify when it's solved again. More explanation to come. Trying to bring everything up again in the coming days and weeks. Sorry for the inconvenience.
  18. Yes, Varo is right. Before seeing the example I was assuming OP is asking for a solution how to handle "basic authentication" of a website or web server with HTTP requests.
  19. Hello @SmileyBot, Last time I tried to use Aymens HTTP plugin I had similar issues. Did you try Heopas Plugin? It is free and has similar HTTP functions as the one from Aymen. For me Heopas Plugin solved a similar issue with the authentication. I believe it will work with this one.
  20. Hello @SmileyBot, Try to pass the credentials in the URL like so: https://username:password@www.example.com/your-file.pdf Feel free to let us know if this worked for you.
  21. Hey @totolcs, you had any success so far? I did not try your exact case, but I think it should be possible. You tried those already? https://wiki.ubotstudio.com/wiki/Cookie_Control In theory you will login once, store the cookie(s) and load them later again, so you don't need to login always. Correct? Additionally you can try switching the Chrome Version inside Ubot Studio's Options, to see whether one version works better for your scenario than the other.
  22. @stephenzeiner Thanks for the share. I also wanted to say thanks for the contribution for longer time already 😁
  23. Alright, please keep it alive. It nicely enhances the basic functionalities of Ubot. Thank you TJ and Phil. 👍
  24. Please go to https://support.ubotstudio.com open a support ticket and explain the bug. Please also include some ready made code that demonstrates the problem.
  25. In general you can scrape simple strings (scrape element) or arrays aka lists (scraping list elements). Without seeing your code I can not confirm. I think it can depend on what you do exactly.
×
×
  • Create New...