tessel

Am I right to say that if you use the headless browser option you need to keep logging into sites? By this I mean I logged into a site, scraped some data and then ran the same login process and the browser wasn't logged in. Looks like the headless browser doesn't stay logged in? I hope I am wrong...

Sorry, it was for no captcha not puzzle captcha. My apologies.

Thank you!

Thanks and um what's the decryption key?

Any chance someone could link me to the Open.Framework.dll plugin? Searched and can't seem to find it on here.

Yes, I'd like to know this as well.

See below. My bad.

Experienced similar problems with UI in beta. I'm definitely not updating.

Dan, question about profiles, again I've noticed that loading FF without a profile is fairly quick. However, loading a profile takes a considerable amount of time the first time ExBrowser is launched. Any idea why this is the case and can anything be optimized about the profile? I realize this is obviously not caused by ExBrowser by thought you may have some suggestions on how to speed it up if it can be sped up. Thanks.

An update. The timeout issue is fixed. I can now use profiles in FF with timeout setting so the browser runs smoothly. My bot has been running 4+ hours doing what it does and hasn't stopped once. Very happy now. Thanks, guys.

No solution to this? Ubot is great because the built-in browser does not have the WebRTC leak issue but standard Chrome does and that's a problem when using ExBrowser.

Oh great... Yes, I have used about:config to disable many things. I can't block URLs because that will be detected as ad blocking no doubt. Thank you for the reply. Unfortunately, this limits what I can do with ExBrowser as the timeout is a major issue. I would use Chrome but it has the WebRTC IP leak that I can't seem to "patch".

Can you please confirm that multiple ExBrowser options work? I have the timeout option added to my Exlauncher, along with profile option, and noticed two things. First, if I have profile option first and timeout second, FF will launch without a profile. I have tested this a few times and can replicate it. Using timeout option after profile option results in FF loading with no profile. Second, if I put timeout option first and profile option second, then FF appears to load with a profile but the timeout setting is ignored and remains at the default 60 seconds. So, is there a problem here OR can

Thank you. Yes, I changed the about:config but don't want to install an ad blocker as the site will detect it. My fix was to change the DNS server I was using. For some reason a different DNS server resulted in much faster loading of the ad urls. Thanks for your help, though. I'd rather use Chrome but the WebRTC DNS leak is a problem and all plugins I've tried don't seem to fix it.

I've noticed that when using FF and navigating to a URL it appears to wait for everything to have loaded. If there are some links (especially ad URLS) on a website that take time to load, then an error pops up warning about the browser not responding. I understand that I can increase the timeout to overcome this but is there any other way to stop the browser from waiting for everything to load before continuing?

ExBrowser people out there do you have a solution for the WebRTC IP leak with Chrome?

Do you have an example of how to load profiles? Also, for binary, if I point it to a directory that has firefox portable installed and a profile in that directory, I assume that just running the .exe won't load the profile in that folder?

Is there any news on Ubot Stealth working better with iframes?

A question. Any problem running multiple bots (.exe) files with this plugin? I currently have 5 x bots running on one PC that do things on the same website but using different accounts. Can this be done with the exbrowser plugin? Each bot and the exbrowser will have its own cookies and no clashing etc of what is going on?

I look forward to it.

Why ignore the thread? How hard is it to reply and say something even if it is "we have no time frame at the moment". At least then everyone will know something instead of being teased and then left in the dark.

a2mateit, no denying that. However, if it isn't released this "month" as originally planned, why leave it until the last or second last day to notify people? Seriously, it's not unreasonable to assume they knew a week or more ago they wouldn't make the deadline. It is poor practice to leave people hanging. Can't make the deadline or think it won't happen? Why not just be open about it?

I know. Terrible of me isn't it lol

Is anyone surprised?

kev123, then a simple update would be doable. If they can make a post and video about the features, then an update with a line or two is not unreasonable. The month ends on Monday so there is still time.