cervant41 2 Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 Hey Seth,Just curious whether you'd ever consider truly making ubot studio flexible enough to allow true multithreading like some other bots do at there on the web? To me, speed is an important asset to incorporate in my bot usage considering how many sites my bots submit to and by having the option to stress my cpu in accordance with multiple threads running various processes, that may be a hell of an added feature Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Praney Behl 314 Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 I second that!! Praney Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ayzo 6 Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 Amen, all the other bot development studios (zennobot, human emulator, magic submitter, all submitter, sick submitter, imacros) support multiple threads and ubot is 100 times more powerful than any of them. The only thing they do better than ubot is utilize multiple threads, if ubot had multiple threads (even if it's only 5 or 10) it would blow them all out of the water. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seth Turin 223 Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 well you can do multiple threads now, using the thread command. everything you put inside a thread command will run in a separate thread. the only real problem is that the web browser takes up a lot resources, so having too many of them will bog your computer down, no matter how many threads you are doing. one thing I'm plannign for the future is to have ubot to socket interactions. it would be a little harder to work with, but it would be many times faster than the web browsers, and you could have 100 threads if you wanted. I have some more things to do before I can work on that though. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ayzo 6 Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 I think it's safe to say most of us are running multiple copies of bots at once and it works fine, it would just be very convenient if ubot could handle them in a single bot so I don't have to open and mange 10 different windows/program settings. But Seth if you do sockets please bump the price up to at least $1,000 because that would be epic but too powerful to release on a massive scale Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Net66 54 Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 But Seth if you do sockets please bump the price up to at least $1,000 because that would be epic but too powerful to release on a massive scale But please give it to existing customers as a free upgrade Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Praney Behl 314 Posted August 21, 2010 Report Share Posted August 21, 2010 well you can do multiple threads now, using the thread command. everything you put inside a thread command will run in a separate thread. the only real problem is that the web browser takes up a lot resources, so having too many of them will bog your computer down, no matter how many threads you are doing. one thing I'm plannign for the future is to have ubot to socket interactions. it would be a little harder to work with, but it would be many times faster than the web browsers, and you could have 100 threads if you wanted. I have some more things to do before I can work on that though. I believe this would be amazing thing for Ubot to do, I can't wait for it... !! But Seth if you do sockets please bump the price up to at least $1,000 because that would be epic but too powerful to release on a massive scale LOL that is funny!! But please give it to existing customers as a free upgrade I agree with Andy, I stand for that!! Praney Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Praney Behl 314 Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 well you can do multiple threads now, using the thread command. everything you put inside a thread command will run in a separate thread. the only real problem is that the web browser takes up a lot resources, so having too many of them will bog your computer down, no matter how many threads you are doing. one thing I'm plannign for the future is to have ubot to socket interactions. it would be a little harder to work with, but it would be many times faster than the web browsers, and you could have 100 threads if you wanted. I have some more things to do before I can work on that though. Hi Seth, Just wondering where in your to do list does this stand. I mean an approx idea on the amount of time this might take to implement to UBOT Studio. Cheers!! Praney Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seth Turin 223 Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 Hi Seth, Just wondering where in your to do list does this stand. I mean an approx idea on the amount of time this might take to implement to UBOT Studio. Cheers!! Praney well, I might work on this stuff once the manhattan project is done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Praney Behl 314 Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 well, I might work on this stuff once the manhattan project is done. Thats awesome.. I am looking forward to it Praney Quote Link to post Share on other sites
daddydanimal 2 Posted August 24, 2010 Report Share Posted August 24, 2010 humm... i been trying to play around with threadsi made my self a proxy checker but its kinda slow if you are checking a large listso i thought ok great i can add threads to make it go faster i tried Thread Sub window While #total checked < %to check my script inc #total checked delay 3 Thread <------everything is exactly the same as the one above Sub window While #total checked < %to check my script inc #total checked While #total checked < %to check <----to keep the bot from saving to text and finishing before the threads are done delay 3 but I'm not having any luck getting it to work rightproblem is both threads keep moving but only one window is doing any thing any help would be awesome Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.