["Pictures" bot eats up free space]

I think I did some batch files but they were to delete unwanted UbotBrowser instances.

But you may be right. Good luck finding them using Forum search.

[[FREE] Find and replace tool with timer..]

Good effort, but I normally just use the replace command found in most text editors.

["Pictures" bot eats up free space]

I know what you are referencing to. I have been in your shoes many times. Unfortunately that is how Ubot works. You can run a thread to in your bot and clear that cache every X no. of secs.

 

I had it built in my Bot Wiki Master Blaster as well that is referenced in the above post.

 

Hope it helps.

Praney

[Dropping Cookies]

You can possibly do it using JavaScript.

 

Here is a sample function:

setCookie(name, value, expires, path, domain, secure)

 

var curCookie = name + "=" + escape(value) +
((expires) ? "; expires=" + expires.toGMTString() : "") +
((path) ? "; path=" + path : "") +((domain) ? "; domain=" + domain : "") +
((secure) ? "; secure" : "")
// Actually placing the cookie
document.cookie = curCookie

 

Combined:

function setCookie(name, value, expires, path, domain, secure)
{
var curCookie = name + "=" + escape(value) +
((expires) ? "; expires=" + expires.toGMTString() : "") +
((path) ? "; path=" + path : "") +
((domain) ? "; domain=" + domain : "") +
((secure) ? "; secure" : "")
document.cookie = curCookie
}

 

You can do some research on the rest.

 

Hope it helps.

 

Praney

[Regex Problem]

Yes

(?<=Replaced\ ).*

would work

[[Forwarded]Hooks]

These can be easily done as javascript events..

 

Here is a good resource that might be helpful:

 

http://chuckeasttom.com/LearnJavaScriptProg.pdf

 

Hope it helps

 

Cheers!

Praney

[Would like to see more thx for Solution]

Well in that case the forum member owe some members loads of thanks...

[[TIP] How to take a screenshot of a webpage and save on a local machine.]

Sounds like a great script to have in stock! However, when I try to run it in my bot, it says 'Unable to load bot because it is not a valid UBot 4 file'.

 

Is there a way to overcome this?

 

Thanks!

I think I did it for Version 3.x, and Ubot 4.x does have a solution for it.

[Radio Buttons UI HTML Panel Issue]

Yes it is a bug, there are many small bugs like this.

[The missing gap to full ubot automation (filled)]

Hey Tony,

 

Thanks for taking the time to create the tutorial for this.

 

I just took the survey, and would be waiting to hear some about this soon from you.

 

Good luck mate.

 

Praney

[uBot paid for itself :-)]

Oh it sure does! Congrats Bud

[[Solved]Is this a bug - type text => $table Cell{ENTER} ?]

This is what you need:

 

set table cell(&mylist, 1, 1, "\{ENTER\}")

 

Hope it helps

Praney

[Prompt user to solve after so many captcha fails?]

Unfortunately can't be done in Version 4.x

[How do I copy text from a page and save it for later use?]

Scrape them, Save them to a variable/list, and dump them on your status bar.

 

You need to go through some tutorials : http://www.ubotstudio.com/tutorials.aspx

[Flash Issue.. Help Needed Badly..]

I've seen a couple of threads already of people saying that v3.5 has useful functions that have been removed from v4. I wonder why they have been removed?

 

Hmm good question.... aaahhh! Don't Know

[Daily LoL]

Are you by any chance using a Chinese Proxy?

[Need to scrape URL]

Here:

add list to list(%website, $scrape attribute(<itemprop="url">, "Delete", "Global")

[[Suggestion] Enhancement require for Include command in V.3x to bring it in V. 4.x]

blumi40,

 

Not sure Why you want it paid. I also pay monthly updates, which are mostly bug fixes caused by previous updates.

SO I don't think asking a useful feature which used to exist in previous version is too much. On top of that it shouldn't to hard to implement. But what would matter is if could be made STABLE ACTUALLY!

 

Don't think people would even mind paying if it works, and not just added to the list with other options.

[Daily LoL]

Google is going Coo-Koo!

[Cant see Java in Ubot]

Leon,

 

Java and Javascript are very different from each other, but is a common misconception.

Ubot has an internal browser and don't think it loads Java.

[[Suggestion] Enhancement require for Include command in V.3x to bring it in V. 4.x]

I say "Yes Please !!!"

 

I don't know if anyone takes any notice of voted up posts, but if everyone who want's to see the include command brought back concentrates on voting for one particular thread as opposed to the many spread around the forum on this particular subject, let's make this one the one to vote up ! +1

 

Praney, would you care to edit your post to include a link to the previous thread, which started this one and has some good observations in it?

 

Phil

 

Hey Phil,

 

Post edited and previous thread link added cheers!

 

Praney

[Is anyone else using the private bot bank?]

Here it is: http://www.ubotstudio.com/forum/index.php?/topic/10708-suggestion-enhancement-require-for-include-command-in-v3x-to-bring-it-in-v-4x/

 

Just created the Enhancement suggestion. Let see what the Dev. have to say about it if... they do.

[[Suggestion] Enhancement require for Include command in V.3x to bring it in V. 4.x]

Many people like the "Include command" back from Version 3.x. But there were loopholes in that command as the script file in it original form needed to be included with the "Include Command". This made it more prone to code piracy.

 

Instead, I would like to suggest a command that could read ubot code and include it on the fly into that command. This could be easily done similar to the "$read file" function that reads text from a source, local or remote.

 

I believe this could have less complications. Reason how it could be all difference and better is that you could encrypt the Ubot code to include and while reading it in the command you can add procedure to decrypt it before the command reads it.

 

Well pretty much like read from file function

 

I will throw in a couple of encryption techniques for all the community if this is implemented.

 

Here is a link to another related thread where I suggested this: http://www.ubotstudio.com/forum/index.php?/topic/10696-is-anyone-else-using-the-private-bot-bank/page__view__findpost__p__55554

 

What do you say?

[Is anyone else using the private bot bank?]

Well if they could just fix the performance issues with ubot it would solve a lot of problems.

 

Big Time!

[Is anyone else using the private bot bank?]

Infact I would like to suggest a command that could read ubot code and include it on the fly. Reason how it could be all difference and better is that you could encrypt the Ubot code to include and while reading it in the command you can add procedure to decrypt it before the command reads it.

 

Well pretty much like read from file function

 

I'll create an enhancement suggestion request, only thing is it may be added to the stack LOL!