Jump to content
UBot Underground

Recommended Posts

A while back , someone made me a demo program with little to no code in it , compiled by ubot.

All Was well , until I decided to check the md5 hash on virustotal.

 

Bam , 24 detections..

How is this possible?

 

Is ubots obfuscation messing with antivirus software / url scanners?

I want to buy the developer edition of ubot tomorrow , but I'm worried about my program(s) being flagged as malicious even though they aren't.

 

The program was created with ubot v4 about 6 months ago , so hopefully things have changed?

If anyone has a recent scan link with false detections on it could they please post it here as well , thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already read it , unfortunately it's a bit useless :l

because of the programs detections , it scares a lot of people off , as well as opens a door for other developers to sales trash.

 

I was recently banned from a marketing website because apparently my file was infected , yet it wasn't , just riddled with ubots false positives.

Edited by Asentrix
Link to post
Share on other sites

Already read it , unfortunately it's a bit useless :l

because of the programs detections , it scares a lot of people off , as well as opens a door for other developers to sales trash.

 

I was recently banned from a marketing website because apparently my file was infected , yet it wasn't , just riddled with ubots false positives.

Prototype and test with ubot and if it has potential and enough customers, convert to another language. 

That's my approach at the moment.

 

 

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already read it , unfortunately it's a bit useless :l

because of the programs detections , it scares a lot of people off , as well as opens a door for other developers to sales trash.

 

I was recently banned from a marketing website because apparently my file was infected , yet it wasn't , just riddled with ubots false positives.

 

Are you seeing the false positive results with every bot you compile, or are you noticing it in specific bots?

 

Does a compiled bot with only a navigate command cause false positives for instance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you seeing the false positive results with every bot you compile, or are you noticing it in specific bots?

 

Does a compiled bot with only a navigate command cause false positives for instance?

This is the scan result on a file with navigate google.com

 

SHA256: b1140c11f390d84b6cb521fc75f169f751ca8621079d9e6b7f86e4e54208d501
File name: false_positives_nav_only.exe
Detection ratio: 5 / 57
Analysis date: 2015-05-23 08:12:33 UTC ( 1 minute ago )

 

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/b1140c11f390d84b6cb521fc75f169f751ca8621079d9e6b7f86e4e54208d501/analysis/1432368753/

navigate("http://www.google.com", "Wait")

 File identification

MD5 73ef02b1f59ec683e95872e250b10db2
SHA1 c87eb715f427050aaad5d4eab28a02381bc84a5d
SHA256 b1140c11f390d84b6cb521fc75f169f751ca8621079d9e6b7f86e4e54208d501
ssdeep
49152:kF+FBdV9JI9ZNhCsj8Eeweygd7hdKqTrsE6QfgVP+gKpyQJpK7x9Ow/GWAz/hjgC:nBNONhCsjAyuTzT6RPt0p0D/GWqBL3
authentihash  a480f7f960a8b74b5abad40f7601890001a4384b0cfdbfe9183333da6a87637f
imphash  f34d5f2d4577ed6d9ceec516c1f5a744
File size 3.5 MB ( 3668638 bytes )
File type Win32 EXE
Magic literal
PE32 executable for MS Windows (GUI) Intel 80386 32-bit Mono/.Net assembly
TrID Generic CIL Executable (.NET, Mono, etc.) (56.7%)

Win64 Executable (generic) (21.4%)

Windows screen saver (10.1%)

Win32 Dynamic Link Library (generic) (5.0%)

Win32 Executable (generic) (3.4%)

Tags
peexe assembly overlay

 VirusTotal metadata

First submission 2015-05-23 08:12:33 UTC ( 14 minutes ago )
Last submission 2015-05-23 08:12:33 UTC ( 14 minutes ago )
File names false_positives_nav_only.exe

Bot.exe

 Advanced heuristic and reputation engines

Symantec reputation Suspicious.Insight
Edited by Asentrix
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is the scan result on a file with navigate google.com

SHA256: b1140c11f390d84b6cb521fc75f169f751ca8621079d9e6b7f86e4e54208d501
File name: false_positives_nav_only.exe
Detection ratio: 5 / 57
Analysis date: 2015-05-23 08:12:33 UTC ( 1 minute ago )

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/b1140c11f390d84b6cb521fc75f169f751ca8621079d9e6b7f86e4e54208d501/analysis/1432368753/

navigate("http://www.google.com", "Wait")

 File identification

MD5 73ef02b1f59ec683e95872e250b10db2
SHA1 c87eb715f427050aaad5d4eab28a02381bc84a5d
SHA256 b1140c11f390d84b6cb521fc75f169f751ca8621079d9e6b7f86e4e54208d501
ssdeep
49152:kF+FBdV9JI9ZNhCsj8Eeweygd7hdKqTrsE6QfgVP+gKpyQJpK7x9Ow/GWAz/hjgC:nBNONhCsjAyuTzT6RPt0p0D/GWqBL3
authentihash  a480f7f960a8b74b5abad40f7601890001a4384b0cfdbfe9183333da6a87637f
imphash  f34d5f2d4577ed6d9ceec516c1f5a744
File size 3.5 MB ( 3668638 bytes )
File type Win32 EXE
Magic literal
PE32 executable for MS Windows (GUI) Intel 80386 32-bit Mono/.Net assembly
TrID Generic CIL Executable (.NET, Mono, etc.) (56.7%)

Win64 Executable (generic) (21.4%)

Windows screen saver (10.1%)

Win32 Dynamic Link Library (generic) (5.0%)

Win32 Executable (generic) (3.4%)

Tags
peexe assembly overlay

 VirusTotal metadata

First submission 2015-05-23 08:12:33 UTC ( 14 minutes ago )
Last submission 2015-05-23 08:12:33 UTC ( 14 minutes ago )
File names false_positives_nav_only.exe

Bot.exe

 Advanced heuristic and reputation engines

Symantec reputation Suspicious.Insight

 

 

Is this a bot compiled with UBot 5.5 and above or UBot 4?

 

If it is a UBot 5 bot, please open a ticket and we'll walk through the issue with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...