Jump to content
UBot Underground

bestmacros

Fellow UBotter
  • Content Count

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Posts posted by bestmacros

  1. I have never heard of Virustotal.  So when I did a search, it seems that it is a free service supposedly produced by Google.

     

    I then went to this site https://www.toptenreviews.comthat has done a superior job of reviewing AV software and I searched for Virustotal.  Not one article was shown by this site.  This site has a long history of doing through reviews.

     

    From your post, you sound like you are frustrated with UBot and its inability at avoiding being flagged by AV software.  I do understand your concern.

     

    Can you direct me to the official site where UBot Studio should register with AV software companies?  I will be gladly to pass it along.

     

    The problem is that there is no site.  We do notify AV companies but to what end?  How do we find new AV companies?  How can we force them to add us to their definitions?

     

    How would we even know about sites like Virustotal?  I personally don't trust free sites.  I have used enough free tools to see that they do not do a 100 percent scan or even present what they actually find.

     

    If there is a better process then please share it.  But don't blame UBot.

     

    Thanks

     

    Buddy

    As mentioned by stever - ubot software is blocked by window antivirus/firewall so first you can contact Microsoft.

    As far as I understand the main problem is build-in file loader which downloads internal browser files - maybe this issue can be resolved, since that is what trigger antivirus mostly .

    • Like 1
  2. were updated to Chrome 67 (which happens to currently be the so-called 'stable' release), would that solve the problem?

     

    If so, I wonder if an immediate work-around would be to use the 'set header' command to essentially spoof the user agent? For example:

     

    I don't have chrome 67 update so I don't know if it solve the issue or not.

    Set header or set user-agent will not help because it only mask the ubot original internal browser useragent but it does not add required functionality.

    it is like putting Mercedes logo on Citroen car - it will not make the Citroen to work like Mercedes - it just make it look like Mercedes

  3. What would be considered a more up-to-date tool that new users might be choosing to use instead of UBot? (I'm mainly asking to get a better understanding of what tool you're referring to.)

    I'm not referring to any other tool, I just pointing to the fact that Ubot today is not so good, as it was before and this is one of the reasons it is "dying".

    It is not good for the new users also, because you need to buy Ubot license (not cheap) and also buy several must have plugins (not cheap) and all this just to be able to automate some websites.

    • Like 2
  4. ubot nowadays is little bit outdated, so I guess not many new users are joining, also there are huge amount of answered questions already so no need to open new topics.

    naked out-of-the box ubot is not usable on most popular websites because of internal browser.

    http request automation using build-in commands is also problematic - you need external plugins for that.

    based on the questions I see on forum - most of them are related to exbrowser, because this is almost a must plugin today especially if you need to automate the website, which is not supported by internal browser.

    In my opinion the only thing, which may "resurrect" the ubot is the ability to do a mobile app automation which is also a must today for bot building.

    • Like 1
  5. when you load the website all its page source including text appear in document text parameter, so all you need is to strip html tags and you will get all the text which appear on the page (unless it has frames). you can also limit it by removing all text which is inside <body> tag .

    but obviously you will get all functions data an other functionality code which you will need to remove also like data between <script> and so on.

    I think that using text convertors is good idea otherwise you need to build parser to get innertext between specific tags which may contain text.

  6. you need 2 loops one inside another - one loop will take items from the list and in the other loop you will count the instance appearance.

    you will need to remove the item from the list to prevent it from counting more than needed.

    something like:

     

    //loop 1

    for i less than total list items

    {

    //loop 2

    set j=i+1

    set counter 1

    for j less than total list items

       {

         if list item on position j is equal to list item on position i

          {

          increment counter

          remove item from the list

          decrement j

           }

        increment j

        }

     save counter for that item somewhere

     increment i

    }

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...