solidrockguy 1 Posted December 22, 2017 Report Share Posted December 22, 2017 I am trying to automate some posting on Craigslist using exbrowser and running into issues with my ads getting ghosted and/or flagged. Is there anything I can do using exbrowser to make my bot look more "normal" so it will pass their sniff test? I am opening a new incognito chrome browser so it is clean when I start it up and only using good clean private proxies. I am looking for ideas on how to simulate a real human interaction and am familiar with adding random delays. Is there a way to make the actual mouse move randomly or to click in random locations or something else that might help? Any ideas are appreciated. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Code Docta (Nick C.) 638 Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 are you using type text 2?using random waits between each action?using unique images?do your proxies pass a webrtc check? https://browserleaks.com/webrtcare you using chrome or FF?using a extension to block the leak?random waits should not be a hard second(1,2,3.)? try milliseconds(.158, .894, .456 etc).Regards,Nick 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
solidrockguy 1 Posted December 24, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 are you using type text 2? Yes using random waits between each action? random waits should not be a hard second(1,2,3.)? try milliseconds(.158, .894, .456 etc). I am using random but not milliseconds. How do you do this? using unique images? Yes and always uploaded from c: not some subfolder do your proxies pass a webrtc check? https://browserleaks.com/webrtc I am not sure if they pass or not - here is what the site shows when I go there from within the FF browser opened from launching the incognito exbrowser FF with webrtc disabled. Does this pass? using a extension to block the leak? If I have a leak from what shows on the screenshot above what do I need to block? are you using chrome or FF? I was originally using chrome but based on talk about webrtc and ip leaks in chrome I switched to FF Any help is really appreciated. If you have scripts that are already doing this I am willing to pay - I am building this myself because I can't find anything that works consistently enough. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
solidrockguy 1 Posted December 24, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 first nav wait(#UI_TB_first_nav_wait_MIN, #UI_TB_first_nav_wait_MAX) stop script alert($Human Delay(5, 10)) define first nav wait(#MIN, #MAX) { wait($Human Delay(#MIN, #MAX)) } define $Human Delay(#MIN, #MAX) { return("{$rand(#MIN, #MAX)}.{$rand(001, 999)}") } I found this to add the human delay - from you of course Thanks. Any help on the webrtc stuff is appreciated. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
solidrockguy 1 Posted December 24, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 are you using type text 2? using random waits between each action? using unique images? do your proxies pass a webrtc check? https://browserleaks.com/webrtcare you using chrome or FF? using a extension to block the leak? random waits should not be a hard second(1,2,3.)? try milliseconds(.158, .894, .456 etc). Regards,Nick I think I have turned off webrtc - here is my browserleaks report now: I had made adjustments using Pash's windows automation plugin to add "human" mouse movements and clicks to specific locations instead of using xpath. I would prefer to use xpath but is it a giveaway to sites like google or craigslist whose sole purpose seems to be defeating bots? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.